Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's 90.7 general score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a quite greater count of pixels per inch of display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture, a lot better 200 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.