Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-05-22 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Galaxy A6, having a 90.7 score against 75.8. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is extremely lighter and way thinner than Galaxy A6. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a much better pixel amount per inch of display, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A6 features a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.