Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), with a overall score of 90.7 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is much thinner and notably lighter than the Galaxy A7 (2017). Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a greater pixels quantity per display inch, a bigger display and a way better 1440 x 3088px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a much higher resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.