Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-26 |
| -- | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is lighter and notably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A70. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, giving some additional features.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a better screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and a much better video quality. The Galaxy A70 features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.