Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy A71's global score of 87.5. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A71 has Android 11, so it provides you some nice extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and incredibly thinner phone than Galaxy A71.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has more pixels per display inch, a little larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. Galaxy A71 counts with a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A71 features a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A71, because it has a lot better video definition, a way better 200 megapixels resolution camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a larger aperture.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.