Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-04-07 |
| -- | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Galaxy C7 Pro, getting a 90.7 score against 78.4. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version while Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot lighter and thinner phone than the Galaxy C7 Pro.
The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a larger display, a higher pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a back facing camera with much more MP, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light images. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.