Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| -- | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S25 Ultra's general score of 90.7. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14, so it gives you some extra features. Samsung Galaxy Fold features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 12 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 256 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, it also counts with a way better video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.