Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-18 |
| -- | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M40's global score of 85. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and noticeably lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy M40. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M40 has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features and improved performance.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Galaxy M40, because it has a quite larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy M40 features a bit more storage for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M40 has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot better resolution camera in the back, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot higher video quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.