Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-04-07 |
| -- | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Galaxy M53 5G, having a 90.7 score against 76.7. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is noticeably thinner and much lighter than Galaxy M53 5G. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12 version, so it gives some extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a little larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a back camera with a much better 200 megapixels resolution, a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy M53 5G counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.