Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy Note 5, having a 90.7 score against 79.3. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and extremely lighter cellphone than Galaxy Note 5.
Galaxy Note 5 features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a way larger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures, a back-facing camera with a way higher 200 megapixels resolution, a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.