Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-07-07 |
| -- | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a general score of 90.7 against 80.4. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is way lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a very superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way larger back camera sensor, a lot higher video resolution and a much more mega-pixels camera. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.