Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Galaxy S9, with a general score of 90.7 against 83.3. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner phone than the Galaxy S9. Samsung Galaxy S9 features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 200 megapixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.