Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 88.5. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Galaxy Z Flip both count with really similar storage capacity to install applications and games, both have equal internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much higher video definition.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.