Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-04-05 |
| -- | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a overall score of 90.7 against 79. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is incredibly thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Compact. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a way larger display, a much brighter display, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a just a little better pixels number per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality, a bigger camera aperture, a way better video resolution and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.