Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-05 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.68 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Xperia XZs, with a score of 90.7 against 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and a lot lighter phone than the Xperia XZs. Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Xperia XZs, because it has a much larger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a quite better pixel number per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Sony Xperia XZs features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less cores (although faster) and less RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Xperia XZs, because it has a way better video resolution, a larger aperture for better low light photography, a much higher resolution back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.