Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-04-20 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Black Shark's 80.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra design is extremely thinner and incredibly lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a just a little better number of pixels in each screen inch, a bit larger display and much more display brightness.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a back camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.