Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| -- | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Blasting black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, having a 90.7 score against 90.1. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and better performance. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and much lighter phone than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3088px, it also counts with a quite better pixel count per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's storage to install games and applications is just as good as the Galaxy S25 Ultra one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has a much bigger camera sensor, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a way better video definition and a larger camera aperture.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro and Galaxy S25 Ultra count with incredibly similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.