Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-01 |
| -- | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.62 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10T, getting a global score of 90.7 against 87.9. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is extremely thinner and a lot lighter than Xiaomi Mi 10T. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a much better performing processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a better display than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has a higher number of pixels per display inch, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little bit bigger display and a lot brighter screen.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T's battery duration is just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.