Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-20 |
| -- | 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 642 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4250mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite's overall score of 85. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot thinner and incredibly lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a better display than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a really brighter screen, a quite larger screen and a just a little better screen density. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster).
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a much higher video quality, a way more MP camera and a bigger aperture. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4250mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.