Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-15 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, having a 90.7 score against 81.4. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot thinner and incredibly lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a bit larger screen, a little bit greater pixel count per inch of display, a much brighter screen and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a way bigger sensor, a larger aperture, a much higher 200 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot better video quality. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 63 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.