Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-17 |
| -- | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, having a 90.7 score against 82.2. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra body is way thinner and extremely lighter than Xiaomi Mi 9T. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a little bit greater number of pixels in each display inch, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little larger display and a really brighter screen. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.