Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-06-01 |
| -- | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.44 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a 90.7 score against 77.5. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and extremely thinner device than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a better quantity of pixels per screen inch, a way better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a quite bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a way higher video quality, a way larger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments, a way better resolution back camera and a way larger sensor.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 6 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.