Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-04-03 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having a 90.7 score against 83.8. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter device than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a bit higher pixels density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bit bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with a lot better 200 megapixels resolution and a lot larger sensor.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's memory capacity for applications and games is very similar to the Galaxy S25 Ultra one, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.