Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-01 |
| -- | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's 83.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot lighter and notably thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a way brighter display and a little bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as Galaxy S25 Ultra, both of them have equal internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a way larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography, a way better video definition and a camera in the back with a much higher 200 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 56% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.