Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Poco M3's global score of 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is incredibly lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10 version, so it offers lots of additional features.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a really superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a quite bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has longer battery performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a greater camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a camera in the back with a lot better 200 mega-pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low light images and videos and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.