Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-11 |
| -- | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Poco X2, having a score of 90.7 against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is thinner and notably lighter than Xiaomi Poco X2. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11, giving a lot of extra features and better performance.
Xiaomi Poco X2 features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch in the display, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better camera than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs, a way higher video quality and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.