Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2021-01-18 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's general score of 78.2. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way thinner and much lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger screen and more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features improved battery duration than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a bigger aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.