Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-05-26 |
| -- | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, with a score of 90.7 against 79.5. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has Android 11, providing the user some additional features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a thinner and incredibly lighter device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a quite bigger screen and a little bit better screen pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a much greater performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video, a much larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's battery life is very similar to the Galaxy S25 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.