Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-24 |
| -- | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 general score. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11 version, providing some nice extra features and performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is a lot lighter and noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little larger screen and much more brightness.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back, a way higher video quality and a larger aperture. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro have incredibly similar batteries duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.