Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.30 ounces |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's general score of 86.1. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11, so it gives you a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per display inch and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better performing processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.