Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-11-01 |
| -- | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's score of 75.7. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and way thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has a better number of pixels per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a way brighter screen and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 200 MP resolution, a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's battery duration is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.