Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 13 |
| -- | 2024-01-15 |
| -- | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| -- | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. Galaxy S25 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro count with similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because it has a way brighter display, more pixels per display inch, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite bigger display. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a bigger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's battery performance is just as good as the battery life in Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.