Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-11-23 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.42 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a global score of 90.7 against 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and much thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a bit bigger screen, a lot brighter screen and a greater pixel amount in each screen inch.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.