Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a overall score of 90.7 against 81.1. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and thinner phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, providing you some additional features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a higher pixel density, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Galaxy S25 Ultra count with quite similar batteries duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.