Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely thinner and a lot lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and improved performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better 200 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S have similar batteries duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.