Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2021-01-18 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, getting a 90.7 score against 83. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is a lot thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version, providing a couple additional features.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a better amount of pixels per display inch, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T feature extremely similar battery performance. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and a camera in the back with a lot better 200 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.