Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.28 ounces |
| -- | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's general score of 80.2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is notably lighter and notably thinner than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit larger display. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 12 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a much better 200 mega-pixels resolution. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with better battery performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.