Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-30 |
| -- | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is slightly better than vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version, counting with some nice extra features and a performance increase. The Galaxy S25 body is noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter than the vivo X70 Pro.
Vivo X70 Pro features a much better processing power than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen pixels density.
Vivo X70 Pro has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S25 takes clearer videos and photos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures, and they both have a 0.64 inches back camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a 50 megapixels, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.