| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy S5 is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a global score of 80.8 against 78.3. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S5 has a newer 4.4.2 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11. Despite of the fact Galaxy S5 is incredibly older and a bit thicker than the vivo X70 Pro, it's construction is still a lot lighter.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S5, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S5 counts with a better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch.
Vivo X70 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy S5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way larger aperture and higher video frame rates.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5, because it has a 59 percent greater battery size.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.