Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Active's score of 75.6. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4 version. Although Motorola Edge 50 is just a little bit heavier than Galaxy S5 Active, it's thinner and also a lot newer.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a better 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, a just a little higher amount of pixels per display inch and a really bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Active counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has lesser processing cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.