Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 432 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is better than the Galaxy S5 Active, getting an 84.7 score against 75.6. Although Galaxy A32 is newer than the Galaxy S5 Active, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Galaxy S5 Active counts with Android 4.4.4 OS.
Galaxy S5 Active features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way greater amount of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A32 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Galaxy A32 features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 79 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.