Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Active, getting a global score of 77.8 against 75.6. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is way heavier than Galaxy S5 Active, it's notably thinner and noticeably newer.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better looking screen than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a really bigger screen. Galaxy S5 Active features an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery life than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 104 percent larger battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S5 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S5 Active. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy S5 Active, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.