Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a general score of 78.1 against 77. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus is noticeably older and a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has 4.4.2 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version, offering a lot of extra features and better performance.
Galaxy S5 Plus features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less CPU cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a bit better display than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a really smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a bit better pixels number per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 79 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.