Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Plus is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 78.1 against 77.4. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, we must note that it is also extremely older, extremely thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's CPU is just as good as the Galaxy S5 Plus one, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S5 Plus features a little bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, a little smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S5 Plus has a bit superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh. Galaxy S5 Plus shoots clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy S5 Plus also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.