Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| -- | 2020-10-23 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 6.66 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.08 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is much better than the Galaxy S6 Active, having a 92.8 score against 80.9. IPhone 12 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy S6 Active counts with Android 5.0 operating system. Galaxy S6 Active features a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater pixels amount per display inch.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a little better processing power than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU and lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 64 bits processing unit, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also counts with 3 GB more RAM.
IPhone 12 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a camera with way less MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with greater battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 24% bigger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 12 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.