| Global Score | |
| 87.4 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-04-11 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminium and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 252.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy S6 is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a global score of 87.4 against 78.3. Galaxy S6 is an notably older phone than vivo X70 Pro, but Samsung made it notably lighter and thinner. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 has 5.0 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S6 counts with an incredibly better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display. The vivo X70 Pro has a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 counts with a bit better hardware performance than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits CPU. Vivo X70 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S6, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 2550mAh.
The vivo X70 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy S6, and although they both have the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better low light images, faster video frame rates and a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.