Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, having a general score of 83.7 against 79.3. The LG V50 ThinQ body is much newer than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, providing you a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a bit sharper screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a bit lower number of pixels per display inch, a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little bit smaller screen. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better performing processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. LG V50 ThinQ captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a much lower 12 megapixels resolution camera, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light environments.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.