Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a global score of 79.3 against 76.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a more recent 5.1 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a newer device, and it's also somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Motorola Droid Turbo features a faster processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor and more CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Droid Turbo features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a way worse 16 MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.