Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, getting a score of 81.2 against 79.3. Motorola Edge 50's construction is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, so it provides you a couple additional features and a performance increase.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a display that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s display, because although the Motorola Edge 50 has a bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen. Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 7 less processing cores and lesser RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola Edge 50 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos, a camera with a much better 50 MP resolution and a way bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.