Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, having a 79.9 score against 79.3. The OPPO Find X3 Pro construction is extremely newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy S6 edge+. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X3 Pro has newer 11 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a quite smaller screen. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a better performing processing unit than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much larger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos, a much higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.